Maryland Nursing Home Lawyer Blog

Central Texas Nursing Home Faces Wrongful Death Suit for Allegedly Providing Negligent Care

January 27, 2014 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

Earlier this month, the family of a recently deceased 81-year old man filed charges in a central Texas court alleging that the nursing home the family placed the man in provided negligent care that led to the man’s death. According to a report by the Waco Tribune, the family admitted the elderly man in December of 2011 after a fall had rendered him in need of constant care and attention.

The elderly man, who suffered from Alheimer’s and Parkinson’s, died in September of 2012, “after months of severe and agonizing pain and suffering” caused by a series of pressure ulcers that worsened into a more serious, life-threatening condition.

The man’s family claims that there was nothing about his condition that made the pressure ulcers unavoidable. They note that pressure ulcers are an avoidable condition that merely require the proper level of care and attention. Instead, the family claims, the pressure ulcers were a result of the negligent care provided by the nursing home facility. The man had never suffered from a pressure ulcer before being admitted to this particular nursing home.

Former Maryland Nursing-Home Operator Ordered To Pay Restitution to Victim and Serve Three Years in Prison for Neglect

January 20, 2014 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

Earlier this week, a man was sentenced in Washington County for the neglect of an 84-year-old woman who was placed in the care of the man’s Boonsboro assisted living facility. According to a report by Harold Mail Media, the man pled guilty to neglect of a vulnerable adult for his role in the 2012 injuries suffered by a resident of his assisted living facility when she fell through the floor in a second-story bathroom. Apparently, the manager failed to properly cordon off the second-story bathroom. The accident left the elderly woman—who also suffers from dementia—without the ability to walk.

While this accident may seem shocking, what is even more upsetting is how it was handled by the manager. The manager reported that he heard a noise and, upon investigating, found the woman lying on the floor with a hole above her in the ceiling. When police responded to a possible assault on the elderly woman a few days later, the manager told police what happened, but said the woman did not sustain any injuries. However, in subsequent talks with the woman’s doctor, it came out that she had suffered a broken ankle, several broken ribs and vertebrae, a broken pelvis and a head injury likely all caused by the fall. The assisted living manager claimed that he “panicked” and didn’t know what to do.

At sentencing, the manager was given an eight year prison sentence, five years of which were suspended in favor of probation. In addition, he was ordered to pay the victim nearly $15,000 in restitution.

Peak Flu Season Is About to Hit Maryland Nursing Homes, Be Prepared

January 13, 2014 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

As if the cold temperatures of winter are not bad enough, every January and February “Flu Season” comes around, putting an extra damper on anyone’s season who is unlucky enough to contract the persistent and infectious disease. However, for some the flu is more than a pesky illness that requires we use a few sick days from work. To the elderly, the flu can be a life threatening illness.

One recent article by the Frederick News-Post notes that, while Frederick Memorial Hospital requires all hospital staff to be vaccinated, nursing home employees are not required to get the flu vaccine. Considering that nursing home employees work with an extremely vulnerable population—the same as the hospital employees—a nursing home employee’s failure to get vaccinated may have devastating repercussions, should an outbreak hit a nursing home.

The Effects of the Flu on the Elderly

To most of us, getting the flu means that we will have to take a week off of work, at the worst. However, the elderly are an especially vulnerable population. In fact, according to the government website, flu.gov, 90% of all flu-related deaths occur in people over the age of 65. This is due mostly to the fact that, as we age, our immune systems grow weaker and have a more difficult time fighting off the flu virus.

Finding a Safe Nursing Home for Your Loved One in Maryland

January 6, 2014 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

Rarely does anyone look forward to putting a loved one in a nursing home. Ideally, we would all be able to provide the care that our aging friends and relatives need in their final years. However, the reality of life often prevents us from doing so and many of us will require the services that a nursing home provides at some point in our lives.

However, nursing homes have a bad reputation, and for good reason. The instances of nursing home abuse and neglect seem incredibly high these days. In fact, a recent study conducted by the federal government found that 1 in 3 nursing homes were cited with some kind of violation that could have caused harm (or actually did) to one of their residents. With all the bad nursing homes out there, how can you be sure that you are selecting a good one for your loved one?

How Do Maryland Nursing Homes Stack Up?

Maryland nursing homes rank below average with the quality of care they provide to their residents. According to the 2013 Nursing Home Report Card, Maryland was given a “D.” Below are just a few highlights from the Report:

Approximately 95% of all Maryland nursing homes were deficient in some manner.
Approximately 17% of all Maryland nursing homes were reported to have “severe deficiencies.
Maryland was ranked 34 out of the 50 states when it comes to nursing home care.

Court of Appeals Upholds Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service’s Findings Regarding $85,000 Fine and other Findings in Nursing Home

December 27, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

A U.S. Court of Appeals recently sided with the federal government in regards to several federal law violations in a nursing home, which culminated in a patient’s attempted escape.

In the case, MISSISSIPPI CARE CENTER OF GREENVILLE v. United States Department of Health and Human Service, U.S. Ct. App, 5th Cir. (2013), a resident of a Mississippi nursing home left the facility without supervision or permission, and wandered out into the street. Luckily, the man was spotted by a staff member, and safely returned to the facility.

As a result of the incident, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services found that, as a result of the facility’s inability to prevent such incidents, the nursing home’s residents were in immediate jeopardy. The facility was subsequently fined $85,000 and ordered to amend its policies and procedures. The facility then requested a hearing before an administrative law judge and, upon an adverse ruling, appealed to the administrative review board. The administrative review board upheld the ALJ’s findings. On appeal to this court, the facility challenged the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service’s factual findings and determination that the Center’s residents were in immediate jeopardy.

Egregious Case of Nursing Home Neglect Leads to Federal Lawsuit

December 18, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

An Iowa woman’s death has reportedly prompted a federal lawsuit brought by her husband and granddaughter, seeking damages for wrongful death, and loss of consortium.

The nursing home resident reportedly died under circumstances in which state investigators discovered that the woman had fallen more than 50 times prior to her death. While it is unclear whether the investigation was limited to this case, the facility was fined more than $10,000 in relation to the woman’s case and for another matter that was uncovered.

The lawsuit, which was reportedly filed in federal court, cites to at least 23 occasions, known to the plaintiffs, in which the family was aware that the woman fell. The documents further allege that the facility failed to adequately notify the family regarding the falls.

Doctor Employed by Federal and State VA skirts Federal Claims in Nursing Home Negligence Lawsuit

December 10, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

A recent case that alleged harm under the Federal Tort Claims Act, DUCKWALL-KENNADY v. US, Dist. Ct., ED Ky. (2013), was dismissed due to the court’s finding that the doctor defendant was not acting within her scope of employment as an on-call doctor for Federal Veteran’s Agency, but rather in her capacity as a treating doctor for a state Veteran’s Agency.

The case alleged that the plaintiff’s husband became a patient of a veteran’s affairs center, called the Thomson Hood Veterans Center (“THVC”), which was owned and operated by the Kentucky Department of Veteran’s Affairs. According to the plaintiff, her husband suffered an accelerated deterioration of his health, ultimately resulting in his death, due to the physicians who worked in the home failing to take proper care of him.

The doctor who provided care for the plaintiff’s husband was simultaneously employed by the Kentucky Department of Veterans Affairs at THVC, where the plaintiff’s husband was a resident, and also maintained “on call” telephonic hours with the United States Department of Veterans Affairs at the VA Nursing Home in Lexington, Kentucky. While her patient, the doctor only provided care to the plaintiff’s husband at the THVC.

$114 Million Jury Award in Nursing Home Lawsuit

December 3, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

A decision reached within recent years in a nursing home case offers a glimpse into the realm of extensive punitive damages that may be available in nursing home neglect cases.

In the case, a 76 year old woman was place in a nursing home in Florida for rehabilitation. Throughout the course of her stay, the staff and facility reportedly knew that the woman was at risk for falls, but allegedly did not adopt any preventative measures in place in order to protect it from happening.

As a result, the woman reportedly fell within two weeks of being admitted. She suffered head trauma and a fracture to the upper arm. According to the lawsuit, she never fully recovered from the injuries.

D.C. Court of Appeals Examines Meaning of Reckless Indifference in Criminal Neglect of Vulnerable Adult Appeal

November 25, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

The D.C. Court of Appeals decided earlier this year in the appeal of a certified nursing assistant who was convicted of criminal neglect of a vulnerable adult.

The case, TARPEH v. US, 62 A. 3d 1266 – D.C. Ct. App (2013), centers on a discussion of what it means to be criminally reckless, as to meet the standard required to convict someone of criminal neglect of a vulnerable adult.

In Tarpeh, the appellant was a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and was assigned the atypical task of transporting a patient, whose residence unit she did not typically work within, to a dental appointment in the D.C. area, an area in which she had never been. The result was essentially a disaster.

D.C. Court of Appeals Affirms “Interests of Justice” Standard in Waiving Notice Requirement in Medical Malpractice Claims

November 18, 2013 | Lebowitz & Mzhen

In the course of nursing home abuse and negligence cases, there are several procedural requirements that must be met in order to ensure that your case is in compliance with relevant state and federal laws. For example, in medical malpractice cases, the District of Columbia requires that you serve the defendant with notice of your intention 90 days prior to filing a claim. Failure to file this notice could result in your case being dismissed.

In a recent case case, Lewis v. Washington Hospital Center, DC: Court of Appeals 2013, the D.C. Court of Appeals discussed the proper standards of review and standard for allowing a case to move forward when the requirement that the defendant in a medical malpractice claim be given 90 days notice was not met. Although the facts in the case were not discussed, the plaintiff was attempting to sue a hospital on malpractice grounds, and apparently failed to serve adequate notice of her lawsuit to the hospital.

The hospital filed a motion arguing that the court should not allow for a waiver of the notice requirement, because in its opinion, a waiver is only proper when the lawsuit involves, “an otherwise unknown or unlicensed defendant, or a misnomer.” Since the plaintiff was not suing an unknown defendant, the hospital argued that the “interests of justice” waiver was not proper. Additionally, the hospital argued that a separate waiver for notice, when a showing of good faith has been made regarding attempts to give notice, was also unavailable, because that was not the case either. The hospital argued, therefore, that the case should be dismissed for failing to meet the standard.